Compulsory Gamification
Game-as-a-Service and Gambling Structures on the Roblox Platform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30962/ecomps.2926Keywords:
Game industry, Roblox, Gamification, Gambling, InterfacesAbstract
The gaming industry is undergoing a transition from a product model to a service one, reshaping typical production and consumption patterns within its media ecosystem. This metamorphosis relies on the use of persuasive tactics embedded in graphic interfaces. To address this process, this study focuses on microtransactions and gambling elements within the Roblox platform, with the aim to investigate their role in the game-as-a-service model. Using a method that combines interface mapping and the application of a gambling typology, we demonstrate that the model in question depends on tactics that make gambling and gamification parameters compulsory.
Downloads
References
ASK, K.; SPILKER, H.; HANSEN, M. The politics of user-platform relationships: Co-scripting live-streaming on Twitch.tv. First Monday, v. 24, n. 7, 2021.
BOGOST, I. Why gamification is bullshit. In: WALZ, Stephen; DETERDING, S. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press, 2014.
CONSALVO, M.; DUTTON, N. Game analysis: developing a methodological toolkit for the qualitative study of games. Game Studies, v. 6, n. 1, p. 1–17, 2006.
DE ALMEIDA MENINI, T.; PEREIRA, Vinícius A. Sonoridades e política das affordances na construção das identidades dos games: dinâmicas silenciosas do capitalismo contemporâneo na indústria do entretenimento. Contracampo, Niterói, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1-15, 2021.
DETERDING, S. et al. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". In: Anais do 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, p. 9–15, 2011.
FALCÃO, T.; MARQUES, D. Pagando para vencer, parte 2: serialização, power creep e capitalismo tardio em Hearthstone. Comunicação Mídia e Consumo, v. 16, n. 47, p. 530–554, 2019.
FELCZAK, M. “Tedious by Design.” Institutionalized Labor of Content Creators in the Game as a Service Model: The Path of Exile Case Study. Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, v. 54, n. 4, p. 527-547, 2022.
GAINSBURRY, S. et al. A taxonomy of gambling and casino games via social media and online technologies, International Gambling Studies, v. 14, n. 2, p. 196-213,
GILLESPIE, T. The relevance of algorithms. Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, v. 167, n. 2014, p. 167, 2014.
GRIFFTHS, Mark D.; NUYENS, F. An Overview of Structural Characteristics in Problematic Video Game Playing. Current Addiction Reports, Cham, v. 4, n. 3, p. 272-283, 2017.
HUOTARI, K.; HAMARI, J. A definition for gamification: anchoring gamification in the service marketing literature. Electronic Markets, v. 27, s. n., p. 21-31, 2017.
JOHNSON, M.; BROCK, T. The ‘gambling turn’ in digital game monetization. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, v. 12, n. 2, p.145-163, 2020.
JOSEPH, D. Battle pass capitalism. Journal of Consumer Culture, v. 21, n. 1, p. 68-83, 2021.
JUUL, Jesper. The Game, the Player, the World: Looking for a Heart of Gameness. In: Level Up: Digital Games Research Conference Proceedings, p. 30-45. Utrecht: Utrecht University, 2003.
KRIJGER, Floris. Free to Enjoy a Precarious Ride: On Entrepreneurial Game Playing in the Platform-Based Food Delivery Sector. Tese de Doutorado. Utrecht University. 2019.
KYE, B. et al. Educational applications of metaverse: possibilities and limitations. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, v. 18, n. 32, s. p., 2021.
LANGVARDT, K. Regulating habit-forming technology. Fordham Law Review, v. 88, n. 1, 2019.
McGONIGAL, J. Reality Is Broken: Why Games Make Us Better and How They Can Change the World. London: Jonathan Cape, 2011.
MUSSA, Ivan; FALCÃO, Thiago; MACEDO, Tarcízio. Lazer liminar: colonização do jogo e trabalho do jogador no RappiGames. ANTARES, v. 12, n. 28, p. 313-340, 2020.
NARIN, N. A content analysis of the metaverse articles. Journal of Metaverse, v.1, n.1, 2021
PAAVILAINEN, J. et al. Social Network Games: Players’ Perspectives. Simulation & Gaming, v. 44, n.6, p. 794–820.
PARK, S.; Kim, Y. A. Metaverse: Taxonomy, Components, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access, v. 10, s. n., p. 4209-4251, 2022.
RAPP, A. From Games to Gamification: A Classification of Rewards in World of Warcraft for the Design of Gamified Systems. Simulation & Gaming, v. 48, n. 3, p. 381-401, 2017a.
RAPP, A. Drawing Inspiration from World of Warcraft: Gamification Design Elements for Behavior Change Technologies. Interacting with Computers, v. 29, n. 5, p. 648-678, 2017b.
ROBINSON, L. et al. Digital Inequalities 3.0: Emergent Inequalities in the Information Age. First Monday, v. 25, n. 7, 2020.
SCHÜLL, N. D.. Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012.
SIROLA, A.; Savela, N.; Savolainen, I. et al. The Role of Virtual Communities in Gambling and Gaming Behaviors: A Systematic Review. Journal of Gambling Studies, v. 37, s. n., p. 165–187, 2021.
SOTAMAA O.; KARPPI, T. Games as Services: Final Report. Tampere: TRIM Research Reports 2, 2010.
SRNICEK, N. Platform Capitalism. [s.l.]: John Wiley & Sons, 2017.
TERRANOVA, T. Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy. Social Text, v. 18, n. 2, p. 33-58, 2004.
VAN DER MOLEN, K. Valorant and the Platformization of Free-To-Play Games: Framing the Work of Content Creators as a Cultural Commodity. Press Start, v. 8, n. 2, p. 21.-43, 2022.
VAN DOORN, N.; CHEN, J. Y. Odds stacked against workers: datafied gamification on Chinese and American food delivery platforms. Socio-Economic Review, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1345-1367, 2021.
WHITSON, Jennifer. Foulcault’s Fitbit: Governance and Gamification. 2014. In: WALZ, Stephen; DETERDING, Sebastian. The Gameful World: Approaches, Issues, Applications. Cambridge, MA, London: MIT Press, 2014.
WHITSON, J.; French, M. Productive play: The shift from responsible consumption to responsible production. Journal of Consumer Culture, v. 14, n. 2, p. 196-213, 2021.
WOODCOCK, J.; JOHNSON, M. Gamification: What it is, and how to fight it. The Sociological Review, v. 66, n. 3, p. 542-558, 2018.
ZANESCU, A.; FRENCH, M.; LAJEUNESSE, M. Betting on DOTA 2's Battle Pass: Gamblification and productivity in play. New Media & Society, v. 23, n. 10, 2021.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivan Mussa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer, by the authors, of the printed and digital publication rights. The copyrights for the published articles belong to the author, with the rights of the journal over the first publication. The authors can only use the same results in other publications, clearly indicating this journal as the source of the original publication. Because we are an open-access journal, the free-of-charge,educational, scientific, and non-commercial use of the papers is allowed, as long as the source is cited.
Authorship
Any person who has effectively participated in the conception of the study, the development of the experimental part, the analysis and interpretation of data and the final wording, is considered as an author. By submitting an article for publication in E-Compós Journal, the author agrees with the following terms: 1. The author keeps the rights on the article, but its publication in the journal automatically implies the full and exclusive disposal of the copyright rights for the first edition, without payment. 2. The ideas and opinions expressed in the article are the sole responsibility of the author, not necessarily reflecting the views of the journal. 3. After the first publication, the author is authorized to take additional contracts, independent of the journal, for the dissemination of the paper by other means (e.g. when publishing in the institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that the complete citation of the original publication. 4. The author of a published article is allowed and is stimulated to distribute his work online, always with the proper citation of the first edition.
Conflicts of interest and research ethics
If the developed research or the publication of the article may raise doubts as to potential conflicts of interest, the author should declare, in a final note, that no links to funding bodies have been omitted, as well as to commercial or political institutions. Similarly, the institution to which the author is bound should be mentioned, as well as others that may have collaborated in the execution of the study, evidencing that there are no conflicts of interest with the result already presented. It is also necessary to inform that the interviews and experiences involving human beings have obeyed the established ethical procedures for scientific research. The names and addresses informed in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication, not made available for other purposes or to third parties. The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. The licensing rights used by the journal consist in the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license: sharing (copying and distribution of the material in any media or format) and adaptation (remix, transformation and creation of material from licensed content for any purposes, including commercial) are permitted.
