Fontes de informação nas redes pró e contra o discurso de Bolsonaro sobre o Coronavírus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.2210Keywords:
Information sources. Mediation. Twitter. Coronavirus.Abstract
This article analyzes the sources of information used in a corpus of 135 thousand tweets made with the hashtags #Bolsonarotemrazao and #OBrasilprecisapararBolsonaro. Our objective is to investigate: what are the sources of information, understood as an essential part of the mediation processes, used in the construction of different discourses about the Coronavirus?; what are the differences between the types of sources mobilized by those who defend and attack Bolsonaro's position? Results point out that while pro-Bolsonaro messages are dominated by alternative media sources, tweets against him have more diverse sources and a greater presence of traditional media.
Downloads
References
ALDÉ, Alessandra, ESCOBAR, Juliana e CHAGAS, Viktor. A febre dos blogs de política. In: Encontro Anual da COMPÓS, 15, 2006, Bauru.
ALVES, M. Desarranjo da visibilidade, desordem informacional e polarização no Brasil entre 2013 e 2018. Tese de doutorado. Universidade Federal Fluminense. 2019.
AMARAL, Adriana; RECUERO, Raquel; MONTARDO, Sandra (org.). Blogs.com. Um estudo sobre blogs e comunicação. São Paulo: Momento Editorial, 2009.
ATTON, C.; COULDRY, N. Introduction. Media, Culture & Society, v. 25, p. 579–586, 2003.
BASTOS, M. T.; MERCEA, D. Serial activists: Political Twitter beyond influentials and the twittertariat. New Media & Society, 1461444815584764-, 2015.
BENKLER, Y.; FARIS, R.; ROBERTS, H. Network Propaganda. Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. [s.l: s.n.].
BOYD, D. M.; ELLISON, N. B. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, v. 13, n. 1, Oct. 2007.
BRUNS, A.; MOE, H. Structural layers of Communication on Twitter. In: K. Weller, A. Bruns, J. Burgess, M. Mahrt and C. Puschmann. Twitter and Society. New York: Peter Lang, 2014.
CANAVILHAS, J.; RODRIGUES, C. Jornalismo móvel. Linguagens, géneros e modelos de negócio. Covilhã: LabCom.IFP, 2017.
CASTELLS, Manuel. 2009. Communication power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CHADWICK, A. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press, 2013.
ELDRIDGE II, S. A.; GARCÍA-CARRETERO, L.; BROERSMA, M. Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter. Media and Communication, v. 7, n. 1, p. 271, 2019.
FERRON, B. Des médias de mouvements aux mouvements de médias. Mouvements, v. 61, n. 1, p. 107, 2010.
GARCIA, R. G.; TRERE, E. The #YoSoy132 movement and the struggle for media democratization in Mexico. Convergence, p. 1354856514541744-, 2014.
GERBAUDO, P. Political parties in the digital era. In: DUTTON, W. H. (Ed.). . A Research Agenda for Digital Politics. Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2020. p. 37–47.
GERBAUDO, P. Tweets and the Streets. London: Pluto Press, 2012.
GOMES, W.; DOURADO, T. Fake news, um fenômeno de comunicação política entre jornalismo, política e democracia. Estudos de Jornalismo e Mídia, 2019.
GOMES, W. Fake news, crise epistêmica e epistemologia tribal. Revista Cult, 8 de abr. de 2019.
GOMES, W. “Nós somos a rede social!’: o protesto político entre as ruas e as redes”. In: Mendonça, Ricardo F.; Pereira, Marcos A.; Filgueiras, Fernando (eds.). Democracia digital: publicidade, instituições e confronto político. Belo Horizonte: Editora da UFMG, p.71-394, 2016.
HEPP, A. Deep mediatization. Nova Iorque: Routledge, 2020.
JOATHAN, Í.; ALVES, M. O Twitter como ferramenta de campanha negativa não oficial: uma análise da campanha eleitoral para a Prefeitura do Rio de Janeiro em 2016. Galáxia. Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação e Semiótica. ISSN 1982-2553, n. 43, p. 81–98, 2020.
LEMOS, A. Epistemologia da comunicação, neomaterialismo e cultura digital. Galáxia (São Paulo), v. 404, n. 43, p. 54–66, 2020.
LEMOS, A. As estruturas antropológicas do ciberespaço. In: Cibercultura: tecnologia e vida social na cultura contemporânea. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2008.
LIVINGSTONE, S. On the Mediation of Everything: ICA Presidential Address 2008. Journal of Communication, v. 59, n. 1, p. 1–18, 2009.
LYCARIÃO, D. Mudanças climáticas sob o prisma da esfera pública: a mediação jornalística como fator de legitimação democrática no caso da COP-15. p. 104, 2014.
MARTÍN-BARBERO, J. De los medios a las mediaciones. Comunicación, cultura y hegemonía. Barcelona: Editorial Gustavo Gili, 1987
MERAZ, S.; PAPACHARISSI, Z. Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, v. 18, n. 2, p. 138–166, 2013.
MITOZO, I. B.; COSTA, G. D. A.; RODRIGUES, C. HOW DO TRADITIONAL MEDIA INCORPORATE STATEMENTS FROM POLITICAL ACTORS IN SOCIAL MEDIA ? Brazilian Journalism Research, v. 16, n. 1, p. 152–177, 2020.
MORAES, F. M.; ADGHIRNI, Z. Jornalismo e Democracia: o papel do mediador. E-Compós, v. 14, n. 2, 2012.
NEWMAN, N. et al. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2019. Reuters Institute, 2019.
NIELSEN, R. K. et al. Navigating the ‘ Infodemic ’: How People in Six Countries Access and Rate News and Information about Coronavirus. Reuters Institute, 2020.
PENTEADO, Claudio L C; SANTOS, Marcelo B P dos; ARAUJO, Rafael de P A. Novas práticas políticas na internet: estudo do Blog Fatos e Dados. In: COMPOLÍTICA, 3., 2009, São Paulo.
PERUZZO, C. M. K. Mídia regional e local: aspectos conceituais e tendências. Comunicação & Sociedade, v. 26, n. 43, p. 67–84, 2005.
RODRÍGUEZ, C.; FERRON, B.; SHAMAS, K. Four challenges in the field of alternative, radical and citizens’ media research. Media, Culture & Society, v. 36, n. 2, p. 150–166, 2014.
SANTOS, J. G. DOS et al. WhatsApp , política mobile e desinformação : a hidra nas eleições presidenciais de 2018. Comunicação e Sociedade, v. 41, n. 2, p. 307–334, 2019.
SANTOS, N. The reconfiguration of the communication environment: Twitter in the 2013 Brazilian protests. Tese de doutorado. Université Panthéon-Assas, 2019.
SANTOS, N. F.; ALMADA, M. P. Midiativismo em rede: Twitter e as críticas aos meios de comunicação tradicionais em um sistema híbrido de comunicação. Esferas, n. 14, p. 18–36, 2019.
SANTOS, N. Esfera de visibilidade e comunicação desintermediada: uma análise do blog Fatos e Dados. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso. Universidade Fedeal da Bahia, 2010.
RECUERO, R.; SOARES, F. B. O Discurso Desinformativo sobre a Cura do COVID-19 no Twitter : Estudo de caso. E-Compós, 2020.
SCHMIDT, J. H. Twitter and the rise of personal publics. In: Twitter and society, p.3–14, 2014.
SEGERBERG, A.; BENNETT, W. L. Social Media and the Organization of Collective Action: Using Twitter to Explore the Ecologies of Two Climate Change Protests. The Communication Review, v. 14, n. 3, p. 197–215, 2011.
SHOEMAKER, P., EICHHOLZ, M., KIM, E., & WRIGLEY, B. Individual and routine forces in gatekeeping. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(2), 233–246, 2001.
SILVA, S. P. DA; MUNDIM, P. S. Mediações no YouTube e o caso ‘Ocupação do Complexo do Alemão’: características e dinâmica de uso. Intercom: Revista Brasileira de Ciências da Comunicação, v. 38, n. 1, p. 231–253, 2015.
STIER, S.; SCHÜNEMANN, W. J.; STEIGER, S. Of activists and gatekeepers: Temporal and structural properties of policy networks on Twitter. New Media and Society, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1910–1930, 2018.
SUZINA, A. Is mediactivism a kind of poor journalism?. In: 12th OURMedia Conference, Bruxelas, 2019.
THOMPSON, J. B. (2005). The New Visibility. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(6), 31–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276405059413
WAISBORD, S. Bridging the Divide between the Press and Civic Society. Nordicom Review, n. Jubilee Issue, p. 105–116, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Nina Santos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The submission of originals to this journal implies the transfer, by the authors, of the printed and digital publication rights. The copyrights for the published articles belong to the author, with the rights of the journal over the first publication. The authors can only use the same results in other publications, clearly indicating this journal as the source of the original publication. Because we are an open-access journal, the free-of-charge,educational, scientific, and non-commercial use of the papers is allowed, as long as the source is cited.
Authorship
Any person who has effectively participated in the conception of the study, the development of the experimental part, the analysis and interpretation of data and the final wording, is considered as an author. By submitting an article for publication in E-Compós Journal, the author agrees with the following terms: 1. The author keeps the rights on the article, but its publication in the journal automatically implies the full and exclusive disposal of the copyright rights for the first edition, without payment. 2. The ideas and opinions expressed in the article are the sole responsibility of the author, not necessarily reflecting the views of the journal. 3. After the first publication, the author is authorized to take additional contracts, independent of the journal, for the dissemination of the paper by other means (e.g. when publishing in the institutional repository or as a book chapter), provided that the complete citation of the original publication. 4. The author of a published article is allowed and is stimulated to distribute his work online, always with the proper citation of the first edition.
Conflicts of interest and research ethics
If the developed research or the publication of the article may raise doubts as to potential conflicts of interest, the author should declare, in a final note, that no links to funding bodies have been omitted, as well as to commercial or political institutions. Similarly, the institution to which the author is bound should be mentioned, as well as others that may have collaborated in the execution of the study, evidencing that there are no conflicts of interest with the result already presented. It is also necessary to inform that the interviews and experiences involving human beings have obeyed the established ethical procedures for scientific research. The names and addresses informed in this journal will be used exclusively for the services provided by this publication, not made available for other purposes or to third parties. The copyrights belong exclusively to the authors. The licensing rights used by the journal consist in the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license: sharing (copying and distribution of the material in any media or format) and adaptation (remix, transformation and creation of material from licensed content for any purposes, including commercial) are permitted.
